PortfoliosLab logo
XMAG vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between XMAG and ^GSPC is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.9

Performance

XMAG vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.79%
-2.86%
XMAG
^GSPC

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

XMAG:

20.84%

^GSPC:

19.41%

Max Drawdown

XMAG:

-16.17%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

XMAG:

-5.60%

^GSPC:

-7.45%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMAG achieves a 0.89% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's -3.31% return.


XMAG

YTD

0.89%

1M

-0.02%

6M

1.50%

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

^GSPC

YTD

-3.31%

1M

0.28%

6M

-0.74%

1Y

12.29%

5Y*

15.01%

10Y*

10.56%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

XMAG vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMAG

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 8282
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

XMAG vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Chart placeholderNot enough data

Drawdowns

XMAG vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMAG drawdown since its inception was -16.17%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMAG and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-5.60%
-7.45%
XMAG
^GSPC

Volatility

XMAG vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) is 12.54%, while S&P 500 (^GSPC) has a volatility of 14.17%. This indicates that XMAG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
12.54%
14.17%
XMAG
^GSPC